Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Commun Biol ; 6(1): 395, 2023 04 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2303703

ABSTRACT

The decrease of antibody efficacy to mutated SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD explains the breakthrough infections and reinfections by Omicron variants. Here, we analyzed broadly neutralizing antibodies isolated from long-term hospitalized convalescent patients of early SARS-CoV-2 strains. One of the antibodies named NCV2SG48 is highly potent to broad SARS-CoV-2 variants including Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.4/5. To reveal the mode of action, we determined the sequence and crystal structure of the Fab fragment of NCV2SG48 in a complex with spike RBD from the original, Delta, and Omicron BA.1. NCV2SG48 is from a minor VH but the multiple somatic hypermutations contribute to a markedly extended binding interface and hydrogen bonds to interact with conserved residues at the core receptor-binding motif of RBD, which efficiently neutralizes a broad spectrum of variants. Thus, eliciting the RBD-specific B cells to the longitudinal germinal center reaction confers potent immunity to broad SARS-CoV-2 variants emerging one after another.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Antibodies , Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments
2.
Respir Investig ; 60(3): 418-424, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1751178

ABSTRACT

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the efficacy of baricitinib in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Among 404 adult patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to our hospital between October 23, 2020, and July 31, 2021, 229 patients with respiratory failure were included. Among these, 41 patients in the baricitinib group and 41 patients in the control group were selected by propensity score matching to adjust for background factors. We compared the survival rates of the two groups at 30 and 60 days after admission. The 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in the baricitinib group than in the control group. However, there was no significant difference in 60-day survival in the two groups. Baricitinib may improve the early prognosis of patients with respiratory failure associated with COVID-19. However, efforts should be made to improve the long-term prognosis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Respiratory Insufficiency , Adult , Azetidines , COVID-19/complications , Humans , Propensity Score , Purines , Pyrazoles , Respiratory Insufficiency/drug therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sulfonamides
3.
Respiratory investigation ; 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1728506

ABSTRACT

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the efficacy of baricitinib in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Among 404 adult patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to our hospital between October 23, 2020, and July 31, 2021, 229 patients with respiratory failure were included. Among these, 41 patients in the baricitinib group and 41 patients in the control group were selected by propensity score matching to adjust for background factors. We compared the survival rates of the two groups at 30 and 60 days after admission. The 30-day survival rate was significantly higher in the baricitinib group than in the control group. However, there was no significant difference in 60-day survival in the two groups. Baricitinib may improve the early prognosis of patients with respiratory failure associated with COVID-19. However, efforts should be made to improve the long-term prognosis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL